After consuming much of the Windham Town Council’s attention
over the course of the past month, the idea of councilors imposing a moratorium
for solar projects was voted down by a vote of 4-3 during a lengthy town
council meeting on Tuesday evening.
At the meeting, supporters and opponents of a moratorium on solar projects were given time to share their thoughts in advance of the Windham Planning Board’s March 14 public hearing and final plan review of a Green Lantern Solar project near Linnell Road in North Windham.
The project would abut three residences on Linnell Road, and
those residents advocated for the council to impose a moratorium until
Windham’s ordinance for solar projects could be reviewed, clarified, and
updated.
The project off Linnell Road calls for a 50-foot buffer between the
project and abutting properties, fencing and the loss of some trees to create
the solar array.
Louise Densmore lives on Linnell Road and told councilors she didn’t see
how the buffer could be defined without a moratorium.
Pam Hageny, whose property abuts the project said she is not opposed to
solar projects but thinks a moratorium was proper for this circumstance.
“The destruction of plant growth within a 50-foot buffer basically
eliminates any semblance of protection the 50-foot buffer provides under the
ordinance,” she said.
Another abutter to the project, Howland Bickerstaff that he was concerned about the project and where the buffer would be.
But Green Lantern Solar developer Geoff Sparrow told the council that
the project has met all required zoning requirements mandated by the town and
clarified what he said were some misconceptions shared on social media prior to
Tuesday’s meeting.
Sparrow said that there is no road planned for inside the buffer and no
studies have shown that having a solar project near residences reduces property
values. He said some mature trees would have to be removed for the project but
that would have to be approved by the Windham Planning Board.
According to Sparrow, there would not be any clear cutting of trees on the project property and a cedar fence would be installed 35 feet from the property line around the solar arrays.
He also told councilors that the project has a 35-year life span and that the solar panels are recyclable, made of tempered glass with components inside encased in silicone in case they were to be damaged during a hurricane.
Engineer Aubrey Strause of Acorn Engineering, Inc. told the council that
that buffer screening plan for the Green Lantern project calls for some trees
at the site to be removed, but a new buffer of young evergreens would be
planted which would grow as the site progressed through the years.
During the meeting, it was also pointed out that the deeding for the
original Mineral Springs Neighborhood Association which Linnell Road is a part
of called for residences to have a 50-foot buffer to the parcel where the solar
project site will be located.
Attorney Elizabeth Buckley who represents another solar project in
Windham told councilors that in order to impose a moratorium, there must be a
necessity for one and she said that Windham already had adequate solar
development controls in place.
Councilors Brett Jones, Nicholas Kalogerakis and William Reiner said
they thought a moratorium would be prudent so the current solar ordinance could
be reviewed and updated as needed.
Windham Town Council Chair Jarrod Maxfield said a moratorium wasn’t
needed as the town could review the ordinance through its Ordinance Committee and
this issue did not meet the standard of an emergency.
He said each of the councilors had studied the issue, researched, and
spent many hours trying to determine the best solution for everyone concerned.
Maxfield, along with Councilors David Nadeau, Ed Ohmott and Mark Morrison voted against imposing a moratorium, with Councilors William Reiner, Brett Jones and Kalogerakis voting in favor of a moratorium. <