Windham prepares for Annual Town Meeting on Saturday

By Ed Pierce

The Annual Town Meeting in Windham represents a fundamental and important part of governance and has since the town adopted its current form of town council form of government in 1975.

Windham voters will gather at 10 a.m. Saturday, June 13 in
the Windham High School Auditorium for the Annual Town
Meeting for 2026. Decisions made by voters will determine
approval of the town's annual budget as put forward by the
Windham Town Council.  PHOTO BY KEIH MANK    

The meeting affords every registered voter in Windham an opportunity to express their opinion and vote on town warrant articles and the town’s annual budget for the coming year. This year’s Annual Town Meeting in Windham will be held at 10 a.m. on Saturday, June 13 in the Windham High School Auditorium at 406 Gray Road in Windham.

Last year a total of 130 Windham residents and members of the Windham Town Council attended the 4 ½ hour meeting and questioned nearly all the 30 proposed town warrant articles. 

The meeting was not without controversy as voters initially voted not to approve a warrant article regarding the town’s operating budget to fund General Government for the 2025-2026 Fiscal Year. Many of those voters left the meeting after that, only to discover that the operating budget warrant article was brought back to the floor for consideration and subsequently passed.

This year, Windham Town Manager Robert Burns is presenting a total budget for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 of $55,788,720, up 10.1 percent from last year’s budget of $50,865,671. Of that 10.1 percent increase, voters attending the town meeting will be making decisions about 27 warrant articles comprising the municipal budget, which is a 4.9 percent increase. Voters have already approved the proposed RSU 14 budget during a referendum on Tuesday, and that budget included an increase of 13.4 percent from last year. 

Burns said Windham’s lone potential Town Capital Project for the 2026/2027 year is the MacIntosh Brook Culvert Replacement at a cost of $624,000 with $208,000 of that cost funded by a grant. He said that the budget increase was not the result of new municipal programs, projects or capital spending, but the cumulative effect of costs largely beyond municipal control, with more than 60 percent of a typical local tax dollar in Windham now going toward education, a share that continues to grow as state funding formulas have shifted funding responsibility to municipalities.

He said RSU 14’s proposed school budget increased by more than $4 million, while Cumberland County taxes will also rise by about 9 percent. For the owner of an average-priced Windham home valued at about $433,000, if the annual budget is approved by voters, the increase would be about $524 more in annual property taxes.

Funding requests include purchasing a new ambulance for Windham Fire-Rescue, new tasers for Windham Police, new servers, firewalls and software licensing for the Windham Police Department, the first year of a three-year Comprehensive Plan Update, Community Park Stormwater Treatment, creation of Forbes Lane Park, repaving of the Mountain Division Trail, and a Brine System and Calcium Tank for Public Works.

New equipment to be purchased if the budget is approved includes a Tilt Trailer, Mower, Dump Truck, Pickup Truck, Chipper, Asphalt Planer, and Used Bucket Truck. The town also plans various equipment rentals, supplies and materials, gravel road reconstruction, surveying, pavement assessment, paving and reconstruction work, roof repair for the Windham sand shed, Varney Mill Estates drainage, a wash bay upgrade for Public Works and continuing the Smith Cemetery expansion project.

Ongoing capital projects for Windham include the North Windham Wastewater Treatment Plant and Conveyance System, the North Windham Wastewater Treatment System Service Connections, the MaineDOT North Windham Moves Project Design installing connector roads, adaptive tech signals, and bike/pedestrian lanes, preliminary engineering of the Windham Middle School reuse to a community center, and the Gambo Property road installation and Public Works Laydown Yard. 

Voters will decide if $10,602,273 in miscellaneous non-tax revenues should be appropriated for the town budget including Local Road Assistance, Boat, Snowmobile, and ATV Registration Fees, Homestead Exemption Reimbursement, Tree Growth Reimbursement, General Assistance Reimbursement, Veteran’s Exemption Reimbursement, and any State or Federal grants or other funds as anticipated to be provided by the Maine State Legislature or Federal Government, toward the total Municipal Budget for fiscal year 2026-2027 as recommended by the Windham Town Council.

Should voters reject the proposed town budget, warrant articles for funding for each town department and services would then have to be considered.

The final five warrant articles for voters to decide upon involve expansion of public sewers, issuance of general obligation bonds for the town’s grant match portion of the MDOT North Windham Moves Project, including the costs of planning, design, permitting, construction, utilities, site work, paving, landscaping, or improvements necessary in connection with the construction of that project, and issuing bonds for town debt service. <

Windham Town Budget passes during lengthy Annual Town Meeting

By Ed Pierce

In what turned out as a marathon 4 ½-hour town meeting, Windham’s $8.9 million budget was eventually passed through a series of unexpected developments and twists that anyone in attendance just couldn’t make up.

Members of the Windham Town Council and staff gather
before the Annual Windham Town Meeting at Windham 
Town hall on Saturday, June 14. From left are Councilor
David Nadeau, Assistant Town Manager Bob Burns, Town
Clerk Linda Morell, Councilor Mark Morrison, Councilor
John Henry, Councilor Jarrod Maxfield, Councilor Bill
Reiner, and Town Manager Barry Tibbetts.
PHOTO BY ED PIERCE  

With more than 130 Windham residents on hand for the Annual Town Meeting at Windham Town Hall on Saturday, June 14, concerned voters questioned nearly each of the 30 town warrant articles, wanting explanations for increases in spending and sharing their opinions about budgeting proposals put forward by the Windham Town Council.

Having elected former State Rep. Gary Plummer of Windham as Town Meeting Moderator, the first six out of the 30 warrant articles were approved following discussions and clarifications by Windham Town Manager Barry Tibbetts.

But voters rejected Article 7 asking for approval of a municipal budget of $39.9 million, and that meant votes were required for each of the next 11 articles. Among those, only Article 8, asking for an increase of 11.39 percent and $8.9 million funding general government operations for fiscal year 2025-2026 was defeated by voters as determined by the moderator. Article 8 included funding for Windham Town Hall offices and services and some contractual expenses, such as benefits for town police officers.

All the other warrant articles were approved by voters, except for Articles 24, 25, 26, and 27, those dealt specifically with creating and funding a new public skating rink and playground in North Windham at a cost of $3 million and renovations to Gambo Park with new soccer field, recreational trails and improved parking at an expense of $3 million.

Article 22, a proposal to construct a new North Windham Public Safety Building behind Hannaford Supermarket off Route 302, involved a lengthy discussion and many questions raised by voters about acquiring the site property, housing a Cumberland County Sheriff’s Patrol Office in the building, and the need to replace the current North Windham Fire Station on Route 302, a structure built in 1960. Tibbetts said approving the article would add 5 cents to the town’s millage rate.

“This substation building meets the needs of today and for the future,” Tibbetts said. Voters approved Article 22 agreeing to its $10 million cost through a combination of $4 million in Tax Increment Financing, using $2.4 million from the town’s General Fund, using impact fees of $1.1 million and obtaining a general obligation bond of $2.5 million.

After the 30 articles had been discussed and voted upon, Tibbetts then reviewed what the implications of the rejection of Article 8 would mean, including the difficulty of rescheduling and legally posting another town meeting, shutting down Windham Town Hall on July 1, potentially laying off employees and not having necessary revenue to meet contractual bills and defaulting on town obligations.

By this time, and after four hours, at least half of residents attending had left the meeting. A series of actions then happened that reversed the earlier vote on Article 8. A voter who had voted no previously then formally made a motion to change his vote, and then a second voter who had voted no to Article 8 previously made a motion to change their vote too and seconded the motion on the floor to reopen the article.

The first voter who had changed his vote then made a motion to amend the budget, proposing to reduce it by $600,000. That was also seconded by another voter who had voted no previously. That meant the original proposed $8.9 budget was back on the table.

Before a discussion on that, a voter from the audience moved to adjourn the meeting and it was quickly seconded. A show of hands to adjourn was too close for the moderator to call, and so votes were counted by the town clerk. The vote to adjourn was voted down.

Following a discussion about amending the budget, a vote to amend the $8.9 million was voted down and then Article 8 as originally proposed was then passed by those in attendance.

At each step voters didn't have to do what they did or vote the way they did. And those who left the meeting didn't have to leave and could have changed the voting.

Windham resident J.P. Belanger attended the Annual Town Meeting and said it was both an eye-opener and a civics lesson.

“Watching the process unfold gave me a deeper appreciation for how our local government works – and how much our participation matters. I left the meeting feeling cautiously optimistic. The approved budget reflects rising costs but also shows our community’s commitment to progress,” he said. “I was especially encouraged to see long-overdue projects like the North Windham Fire Station moving forward – a crucial investment in public safety. At the same time, I was disappointed by the reconsideration of Article 8 during what became a historic 4 1/2-hour meeting. By the time the article was brought back for a vote, many residents had already left. It raised important concerns about transparency and fairness. When community members make the effort to show up and vote, they deserve confidence that those decisions won’t be reversed once attendance thins out. I also share the concerns voiced by others about the rising tax burden. Even modest increases can strain household budgets – especially for seniors living on fixed incomes. With inflation continuing to drive up the cost of essentials like food, fuel, and healthcare, many older residents are feeling the squeeze more than ever. It’s important that we keep their needs in mind as we plan for the future. Perhaps most of all, I wish more residents had been present. These meetings shape the future of our town, and broader participation would help ensure more voices are heard. I look forward to attending more of them myself – because being informed and involved is the best way to strengthen the community.”

Over the days following the town meeting, many angry residents expressed disappointment over the budget passing and claiming they felt “duped” and “disenfranchised” that the Article 8 budget was brought back up for another vote after many who had voted no had left the meeting.

Windham Town Councilor Bill Reiner said he understands the concerns raised.

“I believe it was the fourth item vote of the meeting that was; “Adoption of the rules of procedure as outlined in MMA Moderators Manual.” Those were the rules accepted by a show of hands vote, and the rules followed. All 27 pages of it, it’s not simple but very black and white.”

Reiner said this was the best turnout for a town meeting in four years he’s served on the council.

“Yes, it’s my personal opinion that it’s a terrible time to have an election, but it is stipulated in the town charter that it be the second Saturday of June. Our hands are tied until a change is made,” he said. “Regarding the Town Meeting versus a Referendum vote; each has its advantages and drawbacks. Most clearly that numbers matter greatly in a town meeting forum or any election that has a low turnout. A Referendum vote and a larger turnout is more representative of the population, but no discussions or explanation would be available for voters and referendum language can be tricky."

According to Reiner, he understands that people had valid reasons to leave before the end of the meeting.

“But the town meeting is a live meeting and continues until adjourned,” he said. “People have asked can any item be brought back to the floor and the answer is yes, but only if motioned and seconded by two individuals that had cast a prevailing vote. This is done usually to reconsider or reopen discussion. I can honestly state that there was no plan in place to proceed as was done to reconsider any failed articles. I say this by a simple fact. The two failed capital projects were supported by both staff, and I believe four other councilors and others in attendance yet failed to pass. The town easily could have suggested that both capital project articles be brought back up for reconsideration by two individuals on the prevailing side but did not. If the ‘town’ orchestrated Article 8 because ‘it was to their advantage’ as individuals left early, it easily could have done the same with Gambo and the Skate Park articles.” <